Tuesday, 18 November 2008

Ideology&Roses (and the Hope for the Future)



The great philosopher Slavoj Žižek (above, the one that with a microphone does not look that cool) pronounced his authoritative opinion about the recent election of Barak Obama in this article (hinting in the title at of one of the greatest albums of rock history...how dare he?).

Anyway, after reporting the words of someone else, he comments:

Rarely was the function of ideology described in clearer terms: to defend the existing system against any serious critique, legitimising it as a direct expression of human nature.


This -at least- we like.

To question or not to question, that is the question...

...and since we can't access the BLE we need to know what the question is. Does anybody know what is--if, indeed, there is one--the question? (I don't know how to do em-rules on my new computer. SORRY)

Sunday, 16 November 2008

To blog or not to blog

I have noted with deep dismay that some people still have done nothing to create a Gmail account and join the blog. Not many, I could name them, but that would be embarrassing wouldn't it?
Now, if you belong to this short list, why not spend 5 minutes of your precious time at the computer to do it and email me about it?

Be nice.

To Know what it is like to Know

I was you-tubing around watching old physics lectures from the 60s (I must be a real dork) and I ran into this video. If you have never heard of Richard Feynman, you can either click on his name and visit the wikipedia page or just be happy of knowing that he was a big shot American physicist, won the Nobel prize in 1965, is famous for a series of lectures in physics he gave in 1961 at Caltech, and was a quite annoying mysoginist. In the field, he is a myth. They even made a movie about him.

But this is not the point: watch the video, and please do comment (don't let it go like the Foucault-Chomsky videos: I was very hearbroken that no one liked them). I think I lot could be taken out of it and it is quite coherent with what we discussed last time in the tutorial.

Sunday, 9 November 2008

Fired Up! Ready to Go!

Dearest Myth and Mythmaking people,

As always, I'm posting here the question for next week's tutorial

Do you agree that Frazer’s concern with facticity is an attempt to authorise evolutionary anthropology and comparative mythology? Why should this be necessary if it is the case? What strategies does Frazer employ to achieve this authorisation? What is at stake for Frazer himself in his work and how does it contribute to the production of that very work?


I hope you had a great and relaxing reading week, full of reading and sleeping.

See you soon

Thursday, 6 November 2008

Demeter and Persephone: A Re-Telling

You can read the latest fantastic re-telling of Demeter and Persephone by going to the BLE (http://www.ble.ac.uk/), clicking on 'Teaching Resources', opening the folder 'Demeter and Persephone' and tada, there it will be. Alternatively, you can click on the title of this blog entry and should almost take you there.

Wednesday, 5 November 2008

Conference at SOAS this weekend.

Historical Materialism is a high level conference with some fabulous speakers right on our dorrsteps at SOAS this weekend.

Sessions on Adorno-Emancipatory praxis and conceptuality in Adorno: Some notes on the time of insurrection. One on "All that is fluid is frozen to stone: sex, individuality, non-identity"

Vygotsky, Gramsci, Zizek, Althusser, Lucaks, Orientalism, Postcolonialism, New left in Palestine and much more.

It suggests a donation for entrance but you could blag it if you bemoan the fact that we are studying at universties in a neo-liberal world; (correct this time? please, please say yes) fees, kids, having to work etc!!

Call me on 07958 034 181 if you want to meet up.

Link to website and full program: http://mercury.soas.ac.uk/hm/

Two sessions to wet (whet?) your whistle eg. Friday 10am:

MARX AND PHILOSOPHY SOCIETY: NORMATIVITY AND ALIENATION
Chair: Martin McIvor
Sean Sayers
Alienation as a critical concept
Gaspar Miklos Tamas
The uniqueness of capitalism and the normative content of a socialist political philosophy
Nicholas Joll
The normativity problem in critical theory: Adorno, Bernstein, Freyenhagen

MARXISMS AND RELIGION
Chair: Peter Thomas
John Roberts
Marx and the "critique of the critique of religion‟ today
Sami Khatib
Capitalism as religion: Re-reading Walter Benjamin‟s Marxism
Alberto Toscano
The mask of apocalypse, the flag of fanaticism: Marxism, religion and revolt

Anyway, hope to see you there...x

Friday, 31 October 2008

Philosophy disco

Perhaps Sian et al would like to pilot this programme. I for one would be quite up for a being a guinea pig, not liking those pesky words so much. I can just see us errecting (and then perhaps deconstructing) a big Maypole .

Oooh, i feel a bit of a barndance coming on...

Crossposted from Infinite Thought blog. (Links other than the first posted by me-Clare)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I like Jarvis Cocker's plan to incorporate lectures into his gigs.

Oxbridge lecturers will doubtless be watching these gigs carefully, waiting to see if the lecture-disco format takes off.

Well, I may not be an Oxbridge lecturer, but I could probably do with more music in my classes. When teaching Adorno I once played some selections from Swing Tanzen Verboten!, a collection of Nazi swing music from WWII. Fearing the mystical transformative properties of the tunes, one of my students asked me if he could hold me personally responsible if he became a fascist. But of course, dear boy.

Of late I have been trying to think which areas of philosophy I really, definitely don't want to teach, so that when asked I can resolutely say 'no, not my area!'. So far I have determined two: logic/calculus and ethics. I really, really hate teaching ethics. Kant's categorical imperative, fine, but talking about ickle bitty foetuses with undergraduates - horrible. If ethics means anything it's only as a branch of politics. A very tiny branch, too fragile to hold even the smallest of birds. Perhaps, in retrospect, I wasn't the best person to be appointed to the Ethics committee...but who else was going to approve the participant observation burlesque project!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition: Adorno about Popular Music (now with english annotation)

Thursday, 30 October 2008

Persephone's Flight in 2 minutes

Thx Marco for your You Tube tip.



I don't like words anyway...

a subversive reading??

It might not be one of her best written books, but Margaret Atwood's The Penelopiad makes an interesting read against The Odyssey. It retells The Odyssey from the perspective of Penelope and the twelve maids in an attempt to reclaim a bit of personality for poor ol' Penelope, who gets a bit of a raw deal in Homer's version! It's quite funny but if you ask me I might not say it's as cutting as it perhaps intends to be. It doesn't really create a new perspective but merely defends Penelope and the maids of Homer by giving them a bit more depth and a good dose of synicism. All the good ones (Helen, Eurycleia, Telemachus etc.) are irritating and unrealistic and the Gods aren't all they're cracked up to be, is the general take. Taster below to see if you're interested. It's an easy read and won't take very long to get through but it gave me a bit to think about:

"He was always so plausible. Many people have believed that his version of events was the true one, give or take a few murders, a few beautiful seductresses, a few one-eyed monsters. Even I believed him, from time to time. I knew he was tricky and a liar. I just didn't think he would play his tricks and try out his lies on me. Hadn't I been faithful? ... And what did I amount to, once the official version gained ground? An edifying legend. A stick used to beat other women with.

...

"Day after day I would climb up to the top floor of the palace and look out over the harbour. Day after day there was no sign. Sometimes there were ships, but never the ship I longed to see.

Rumours came, carried by other ships. Odysseus and his men had got drunk at their first port of call and the men had mutinied, said some; no, said others, they'd eaten a magic plant that had caused them to lose their memories, and Odysseus had saved them by having them tied up and carried onto the ships. Odysseus had been in a fight with a giant one-eyed Cyclops, said some; no, it was only a one-eyed tavern keeper, said another, and the fight was over non-payment of the bill. Some of the men had been eaten by cannibals, said some; no, it was just a brawl of the usual kind, said others, with ear-bitings and nosebleeds and stabbings and eviscerations. Odysseus was the guest of a goddess on an enchanted isle, said some; she'd turned his men into pigs - not a hard job in my view - but had turned them back into men because she'd fallen in love with him and was feeding him unheard-of delicacies prepared by her own immortal hands, and the two of them made love deliriously every night; no, said others, it was just an expensive whorehouse, and he was sponging off the Madam"

Monday, 27 October 2008

Maama Blair and She One Pickney




Maama Blair and She One Pickney!

Or

A Tale of Authority

Ay buoy guess wa appen, me hear se dis maanin over Maasa Pickens lan se sombudy grab up Maama Blair daata!

Mek a tell wa appen it seem like Maama went fe look fe she one pickney and keyaan see she nowhere, Maama search all over de fe she, she waak an look from one side a de land to de udder askin every baady if dem see er.

Well it look like some lil bouy dem was tendin sum goat and dem tell Maama Blair se dem see Maasa Pickens’ overseer grab de gaal wile she was washing dem clothes and tek er pan is haas an dem gaan in de grung.

Well wen Maama Blair heer dis maan she gaan mad, she halla and baal till dem could hear she till a BackDam. Maama tek she bed an nah move from deh an nah mek no healin fa nobaady. Wen dem caal she fi cum she na movin fi nobaady.

Well dis carry on fah me na know how lang but lang lang time, dem seh she lay dung feh a lang lang time an she kass-kass. Dem people workin ah de plantation sick, dem come dung wid dis an dat an cut demself bad. But maan she nah get up but stay ah she bed an cry an wail.

So nex, ting me ere say she start fe get up an look pan sum a de sick people, she keyaan stop carin fah dem udder people pickney yuh see.

But ebry minute she get she look fuh she only daata Cicely. Waakin all aroun’ an about weh de maasa people let she, till she gan an aks Maasa Pickens fe she daata an tell im all dat she hear from de lil bouy dem. Maasa nah k wah appen but im seh im will aks de overseer an see wha im seh.

Well im cum bak tell maama dat de overseer keyaan give up Cicely cause im does get one pound for every child im faader pan de gaal.

Maama wail and baal and say she nah guh do nutt’n anymore, seh she nah go help or tek care a dem people who hut demself an dem one who keyaan walk an bleedin an bruck up. .

An so yuh know maasa know im have fe get in de cane an need im slaves fuh do it, de white dackta won’t look pan we maama is de one who look pan dem, mek dem feel good yuh see.
Maasa tell Maama Blair if Cicely av pickney she av fe stay wid de overseer, she ave fe care fe she pickney.

Anyhow maama went fe get she daata, eh eh nex ting one a dem ouse bouys tell Maasa Pickens Cicely gat six pickney !

Maan mek a tel yuh Maasa tun pan Maama and tell she Cicely a fe stay wid de overseer fuh six mont a de year fe raise she pickney dem an den she keyaan cum back to she maama fe de res a de time.

Well yuh know all ting cum roun an Maama does fix up people now, and look after dem but wen dark time does cum she stay inna she ouse an nah see nobaady an nah do nutt'in.

But buoy de las ting me guh tell yuh? Cicely is Maasa Pickens daata!

Sunday, 26 October 2008

MA Tutorial Group Activity – Positive Group

Firstly, apologies to Holly for the late response to her post, this will be the first time that I have used a blog and (being the technophobe that I am) I have had to gear myself up to do it.

In the tutorial I was paired with Jonathon and we were set the task of critiquing the scholarship of Holly and Jenny in a positive way. Without reiterating what Holly has said, the exercise was an example of the ways in which myth is constructed as a category. Here is what Jonathon and I came up with…

“The scholarship of Holly and Jenny is one of cutting edge genius. Their academia addresses the reassessment of contemporary issues spanning the globe, from the UK to South Asia. Their field of study allows for the de-construction of the errors of the past, creating a new, self-reflexive, insight that is vital for understanding the controversies of modern life today. Their work is breaking boundaries, with a particular focus towards championing feminism. Studying at SOAS encourages these two mavericks to flourish within a pioneering academic institution.”

Friday, 24 October 2008

Next Week

The tutorial question for next week:

What is particularly ‘romantic’ about the concept of the ‘folk’ and what is dangerous about connecting the folk to conceptions of national identity? What role does myth play in this formulation?


Moreover, think about the keywords that Sian mentioned during the last lecture: 'authentic' (you might want to jump a little to existentialism/Heidegger/Nazism?), 'pure', 'original'.

Whatever new ideas you might have about these are welcome so feel free to use this page to comment.

Have a nice weekend